Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 16;6(3-4):268–276. doi: 10.1159/000480668

Table 1.

Reported clinical rates range from 0 to 12.5% embolization to new territory

Study Subjects, n New territory embolization Distal embolization Ref.
Gascou et al., 2014 144 18 (12.5%) 26
Kurre et al., 2013 105 12 (11.4%) 31
NASA, 2013 338 18 (5.3%) 55 (16.3%) 11
Gratz et al., 2014 227 15 (6.6%) 27
MR CLEAN, 2015 233 20 (8.6%) 1
EXTEND-IA, 2015 35 2 (5.7%) 2
Klinger-Gratz et al., 2015 57 13 (22.8%) 28
McTaggart et al. (traditional group), 2016 53 6 (11.3%) 32
McTaggart et al. (CAPTIVE group), 2016 39 2 (5.1%) 32