Table 2.
2002 | 2005 | 2009 | 2013 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Model1 | Model2 | Model3 | Model4 | Model5 | Model5 | Model5 | Model5 | |
Network structure | ||||||||
Edge | -1.51 (0.08) *** | -1.58 (0.08) *** | -3.4 (0.19) *** | -3.34 (0.19) *** | -2.75 (0.28) *** | -2.8 (0.27) *** | -2.65 (0.3) *** | -2.81 (0.33) *** |
Reciprocity | 0.24 (0.18) | -0.46 (0.2) * | 0.00 (0.29) | 0.03 (0.29) | 0.00 (0.3) | 0.26 (0.31) | -0.06 (0.35) | -0.73 (0.35) * |
Geometrical weighted in-degree (popularity spread) | -11.51 (0.53) *** | -10.66 (0.55) *** | -4 (0.44) *** | -3.96 (0.45) *** | -3.88 (0.46) *** | -4.26 (0.47) *** | -3.64 (0.46) *** | -4.20 (0.53) *** |
Receiver effects (“Work” community effects) | ||||||||
Violent crime rate | 4.67 (0.87) *** | 1.62 (1.06) | -8.39 (1.83) *** | -5.54 (1.98) ** | -7.07 (2.05) *** | -13.07 (2.46) *** | -10.88 (3.18) *** | -14.11 (4.63) ** |
Residential stability | -0.65 (0.08) *** | -0.65 (0.07) *** | -0.82 (0.11) *** | -0.83 (0.11) *** | -0.63 (0.11) *** | -0.8 (0.12) *** | ||
Racial and ethnic diversity | -0.32 (0.07) *** | -0.34 (0.07) *** | -0.39 (0.07) *** | -0.48 (0.07) *** | -0.37 (0.08) *** | -0.34 (0.08) *** | ||
Density of local jobs | 3.33 (0.15) *** | 3.38 (0.16) *** | 3.7 (0.33) *** | 3.4 (0.31) *** | 3.72 (0.35) *** | 3.52 (0.41) *** | ||
Sender effects (“Home” community effects) | ||||||||
Violent crime rate | -4.75 (1.38) *** | -8.12 (1.44) *** | -7.61 (2.40) ** | -5.67 (2.56) * | -7.11 (2.67) ** | -3.9 (2.85) | -8.74 (3.39) ** | -18.21 (4.87) *** |
Residential stability | 0.38 (0.09) *** | 0.37 (0.09) *** | 0.54 (0.11) *** | 0.66 (0.12) *** | 0.48 (0.12) *** | 0.16 (0.13) | ||
Racial and ethnic diversity | 0.37 (0.09) *** | 0.36 (0.09) *** | 0.33 (0.1) *** | 0.35 (0.09) *** | 0.18 (0.09) † | 0.2 (0.09) * | ||
Density of local jobs | -0.07 (0.06) | -0.06 (0.06) | 0.34 (0.32) | 0.5 (0.31) | 0.61 (0.36) † | 0.94 (0.42) * | ||
Relational effects | ||||||||
Spatial proximity | 1.99 (0.14) *** | 1.12 (0.17) *** | 2.37 (0.22) *** | 2.33 (0.21) *** | 2.24 (0.22) *** | 2.09 (0.22) *** | 1.49 (0.25) *** | 2.3 (0.26) *** |
Transportation | 0.36 (0.03) *** | 0.42 (0.04) *** | 0.39 (0.04) *** | 0.38 (0.04) *** | 0.36 (0.04) *** | 0.36 (0.04) *** | 0.35 (0.05) *** | |
Dissimilarity | ||||||||
Violent crime rate | -10.06 (1.65) *** | -6.67 (1.82) *** | -8.45 (2.61) ** | -6.63 (2.79) * | -6.71 (2.94) * | -7.68 (3.8) * | -6.4 (5.45) | |
Residential stability | -0.34 (0.12) ** | -0.24 (0.13) † | -0.18 (0.13) | -0.04 (0.14) | ||||
Racial and ethnic diversity | -0.25 (0.09) ** | -0.13 (0.09) | -0.26 (0.1) ** | -0.25 (0.11) * | ||||
Density of local jobs | -0.42 (0.33) | -0.47 (0.31) | -0.52 (0.35) | -0.88 (0.42) * | ||||
AIC | 3213 | 3014 | 1782 | 1773 | 1760 | 1786 | 1576 | 1486 |
BIC | 3260 | 3067 | 1869 | 1867 | 1874 | 1900 | 1689 | 1600 |
Notes: Main cells represent ERGM estimates. Standard errors in parentheses. N = 77 nodes (community areas).
p < .001,
p < .01,
p < .05,
p <.10