Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 31.
Published in final edited form as: Foot Ankle Spec. 2015 May 8;8(4):255–259. doi: 10.1177/1938640015585957

Table 1.

Comparison of Final Results Between Groups 1 and 2a.

Charcot Without Ulcer (Group 1), N = 35 Charcot With Ulcer (Group 2), N = 22 P Value
Age (years) 56.7 (11.3) 57.8 (10.2) .70
Gender (males), n (%) 21 (60%) 15 (65%) .69
Duration of diabetes (years) 17.3 (11.2) 12.9 (7.9) .10
Insulin use, n (%) 26 (74%) 17 (74%) .97
Body mass index 34.4 (6.5) 35.7 (6.5) .47
Michigan Neuropathy Screening Index 7.2 (0.9) 8.1 (1.1) .0015
Sanders/Frykberg Classification (type 2/3) 21/14 9/13 .26
SF Physical Function 40.4 (28.4) 38.5 (28.5) .80
Role Physical 31.6 33.3 .88
Bodily Pain 42.8 (27.8) 59.1 (29.7) .04
General Health 45.3 (18.9) 45.7 (20.6) .95
Vitality 46.1 (22.2) 47.8 (27.0) .80
Social Function 57.1 (32.3) 67.4 (30.1) .23
Role Emotional 100 (100%) 100 (100%) .99
Mental Health 68 (32) 72 (36) .26
PCS 30.8 (9.5) 32.3 (8.9) .56
MCS 48.4 (12.2) 50.6 (12.5) .52
FAAM ADL (%) 45.1 (24.8) 51.9 (12.7) .18
FAAM Sports (%) 17.3 (20.0) 17.4 (14.1) .99

Abbreviations: PCS, Physical Component Summary Score of the SF-36; MCS, Mental Component Summary Score of the SF-36; FAAM, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; ADL, activities of daily living.

a

SF-36 (average score for each subscale, PCS, and MCS) and FAAM average scores for both groups in bottom half of table (italicized).