Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 31;12(10):e0187287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187287

Table 2. The performances of EAMA and that of the naïve method using the simulated count datasets.

Method Sensitivity Specificity FDR FNR
EAMA 0.870 0.968 0.129 0.032
Naïve 0.904 0.942 0.204 0.025