Table 2. The performances of EAMA and that of the naïve method using the simulated count datasets.
Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | FDR | FNR |
---|---|---|---|---|
EAMA | 0.870 | 0.968 | 0.129 | 0.032 |
Naïve | 0.904 | 0.942 | 0.204 | 0.025 |
Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | FDR | FNR |
---|---|---|---|---|
EAMA | 0.870 | 0.968 | 0.129 | 0.032 |
Naïve | 0.904 | 0.942 | 0.204 | 0.025 |