Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 20;8(48):83673–83683. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19415

Table 1. Correlation between CEACAM6 protein expression and clinicopathological features of GC.

Parameters cases CEACAM6 expression χ2 P
Negative (%) Positive (%)
Tumor diameter 48.652 < .001
< 5 256 172 (67.2%) 84 (32.8%)
> =5 180 60 (15.6%) 120 (84.4%)
Lauren classification 172.187 < .001
Diffuse type 223 187 (83.9%) 36 (16.1%)
Intestinal type 213 45 (21.1%) 168 (78.9%)
TNM stage 176.634 < .001
I 90 85 (94.4%) 5 (5.6%)
II 104 84 (80.8%) 20 (19.2%)
III 173 57 (32.9%) 116 (67.1%)
IV 69 6(8.7%) 63 (91.3%)
Vascular invasion 121.548 < .001
No 183 106 (57.9%) 77 (42.1%)
Yes 253 23 (9.1%) 230 (90.9%)
Lymph node metastasis 104.314 < .001
No 166 140 (84.3%) 26 (15.7%)
Yes 270 92 (34.1%) 178 (65.9%)
Distant metastasis 53.594 < .001
No 375 226 (60.3%) 149 (39.7%)
Yes 61 6 (9.8%) 55 (90.2%)