Table 2. Sensitivity analysis for drinkers vs non-drinkers.
| Excluding study | RR and 95% CI | P value | Heterogeneity (%) | P value for heterogeneity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gordon 1984 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.184 | 23.2 | 0.151 |
| Gordon 1984 | 1.03 (1.00–1.07) | 0.088 | 4.2 | 0.404 |
| Kono 1987 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.208 | 24.0 | 0.142 |
| Stemmermann 1990 | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.217 | 24.7 | 0.134 |
| Kato 1992 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.202 | 16.6 | 0.233 |
| Galanis 1998 | 1.04 (0.99–1.08) | 0.139 | 19.1 | 0.200 |
| Fujino 2002 | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.183 | 25.2 | 0.129 |
| Fujino 2002 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.219 | 23.8 | 0.144 |
| Sasazuki 2002 | 1.04 (0.98–1.09) | 0.173 | 25.0 | 0.131 |
| Barstad 2005 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.247 | 20.3 | 0.185 |
| Nakaya 2005 | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.179 | 25.1 | 0.130 |
| Larsson 2006 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.212 | 22.2 | 0.163 |
| Sjodahl 2006 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.214 | 23.0 | 0.153 |
| Freedman 2007 | 1.04 (0.99–1.09) | 0.084 | 15.3 | 0.249 |
| Sung 2007 | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.294 | 23.1 | 0.152 |
| Kim 2010 | 1.04 (0.98–1.10) | 0.210 | 24.5 | 0.136 |
| Steevens 2010 | 1.04 (0.99–1.09) | 0.130 | 22.8 | 0.155 |
| Moy 2010 | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.193 | 25.2 | 0.129 |
| Kim 2010 | 1.04 (0.98–1.10) | 0.219 | 25.2 | 0.130 |
| Kim 2010 | 1.04 (0.99–1.09) | 0.136 | 22.3 | 0.162 |
| Duell 2011 | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.201 | 25.1 | 0.130 |
| Everatt 2012 | 1.03 (0.98–1.07) | 0.232 | 15.2 | 0.251 |
| Yang 2012 | 1.04 (0.99–1.10) | 0.122 | 22.6 | 0.157 |
| Jung 2012 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.197 | 24.7 | 0.134 |
| Jayalekshmi 2015 | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.222 | 21.7 | 0.168 |