Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 14;8(48):84459–84472. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20880

Table 2. Sensitivity analysis for drinkers vs non-drinkers.

Excluding study RR and 95% CI P value Heterogeneity (%) P value for heterogeneity
Gordon 1984 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.184 23.2 0.151
Gordon 1984 1.03 (1.00–1.07) 0.088 4.2 0.404
Kono 1987 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.208 24.0 0.142
Stemmermann 1990 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 0.217 24.7 0.134
Kato 1992 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.202 16.6 0.233
Galanis 1998 1.04 (0.99–1.08) 0.139 19.1 0.200
Fujino 2002 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 0.183 25.2 0.129
Fujino 2002 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.219 23.8 0.144
Sasazuki 2002 1.04 (0.98–1.09) 0.173 25.0 0.131
Barstad 2005 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.247 20.3 0.185
Nakaya 2005 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 0.179 25.1 0.130
Larsson 2006 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.212 22.2 0.163
Sjodahl 2006 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.214 23.0 0.153
Freedman 2007 1.04 (0.99–1.09) 0.084 15.3 0.249
Sung 2007 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 0.294 23.1 0.152
Kim 2010 1.04 (0.98–1.10) 0.210 24.5 0.136
Steevens 2010 1.04 (0.99–1.09) 0.130 22.8 0.155
Moy 2010 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 0.193 25.2 0.129
Kim 2010 1.04 (0.98–1.10) 0.219 25.2 0.130
Kim 2010 1.04 (0.99–1.09) 0.136 22.3 0.162
Duell 2011 1.03 (0.98–1.09) 0.201 25.1 0.130
Everatt 2012 1.03 (0.98–1.07) 0.232 15.2 0.251
Yang 2012 1.04 (0.99–1.10) 0.122 22.6 0.157
Jung 2012 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.197 24.7 0.134
Jayalekshmi 2015 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.222 21.7 0.168