Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 27;5:278. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00278

Table 2.

Identification of mosquito breeding habitats in the immediate environment of the respondents.

Potential breeding habitats in the environment of the respondents Mosquito source identifieda


Existent (%) Non-existent (%) Unknown (%) Yes (%) No (%)
Abandoned manure pitb 42 (38.2) 40 (36.4) 28 (25.5) 13 (31.0) 24 (57.1)
Active manure pit 41 (36.0) 48 (42.1) 25 (21.9) 8 (19.5) 22 (53.7)
Underground water reservoirb 28 (26.2) 41 (38.3) 38 (35.5) 5 (17.9) 17 (60.7)
Rain barrel 99 (86.1) 9 (7.8) 7 (6.1) 45 (45.5) 24 (24.2)
Wellb 39 (35.5) 47 (42.7) 24 (21.8) 2 (5.1) 23 (59.0)
Rain gutter 94 (87.0) 9 (8.3) 5 (4.6) 5 (5.3) 52 (55.3)
Water pool, pond 74 (67.9) 30 (27.5) 5 (4.6) 22 (29.7) 18 (24.3)
Peat bogb 8 (7.7) 96 (92.3) 0 (0.0) 4 (50.0) 1 (12.5)
Brook 60 (54.5) 50 (45.5) 0 (0.0) 12 (20.0) 22 (36.7)
Ditch 26 (24.8) 72 (68.6) 7 (6.7) 5 (19.2) 10 (38.5)
Tree holeb 68 (61.8) 9 (8.2) 33 (30.0) 8 (11.6) 31 (44.9)
Other water sourcesb 26 (22.8) 84 (73.7) 4 (3.5) 14 (53.8) 3 (11.5)

aThe percentage is based only on positive answers (“existent”) given in “Potential breeding habitats in the environment of the respondents”.

bBreeding sites that are known to be used by Anopheles plumbeus.