Table 1: Association of risk factors with H. pylori infection in different regions
Association of risk factors with H. pylori infection | References | ||||||||||
Country | Study population (number of subjects) | Age range (years) | Yes | No | |||||||
Czech | Healthy children | 0-15 | • Two or more children in the household | Sykora et al42 | |||||||
Republic | (1,545) | 0-15 | |||||||||
• Institutionalization of the child | |||||||||||
• Lack of formal education of the father | |||||||||||
Greece | Symptomatic | Mean | • Socioeconomic status | Roma et al41 | |||||||
children (100) | 11.02 | • Parental educational level | |||||||||
• Number of children in the household | |||||||||||
• Sharing a room or a bed with parents or siblings | |||||||||||
Taiwan | Healthy high-school | Mean 14.3 | • Number of siblings | Chi et al40 | |||||||
students (106) | • Household size | ||||||||||
• Parental educational level | |||||||||||
• Family income | |||||||||||
Pakistan | Children (1,976) | 1-15 | • Lower socioeconomic status | • Water source to household | Jafri et al39 | ||||||
• Lower educational status of the child’s father | • Tyoe of housing | Jafri et al39 | |||||||||
Turkey | Healthy children | 2-12 | • Lower family income | Yucel et al34 | |||||||
(165) | • Poor living conditions | ||||||||||
• Lower educational status of the mother | |||||||||||
• Higher number of siblings | |||||||||||
Italy | Healthy children | 5-16 | • Living in rural areas | • Socioeconomic status for children in rural areas | Fujimura et al38 | ||||||
(2,810) | • Contact with dogs for children in rural areas | • Breast-fed history for children in rural and urban areas | |||||||||
• Lower socioeconomic status for children in urban areas | |||||||||||
• Attending daycare centers for children in urban areas | |||||||||||
Sao | Healthy children | Mean 6.82 | • Gender | Miranda et al45 | |||||||
Paulo, | (326) | • Race (white or nonwhite) | |||||||||
Brazil | • Breast-feeding | ||||||||||
• Number of people in the home | |||||||||||
• Number of rooms | |||||||||||
• Bed sharing | |||||||||||
• Living in a shantytown | |||||||||||
• Family income | |||||||||||
• Nutritional status | |||||||||||
Brazil | Healthy children | 0.5-12 | • Absence of a sewage system | • Maternal educational level | Parente et al46 | ||||||
(303) | • Absence of garbage collection service | ||||||||||
• Absence of indoor plumbing | |||||||||||
Brazil | Healthy children | Mean 6.1 | • Increased number of children in the household | Queiroz et al44 | |||||||
(133) | • Use of well water | ||||||||||
Brazil | Healthy children | Mean 6.8 | • A larger sibling number | Dattoli et al43 | |||||||
(1,104) | • Nursery attendance | ||||||||||
• Location of the house at an unpaved street | |||||||||||
• Absence of a flush toilet |