Table 4.
Testing Group | Mt b | M1 c | M2 d | χ2 | p e |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HbMPK3/HbMPK6–MeMPK2 | 348 | 6 | 11 | 1.47 | 0.22525 |
HbMPK10/HbMPK12–MeMPK20 | 513 | 16 | 36 | 7.69 | 0.00555 |
HbMPK11/HbMPK16–MeMPK6 | 369 | 10 | 16 | 1.38 | 0.23932 |
HbMPK16/HbMPK19–MeMPK6 | 369 | 10 | 16 | 1.38 | 0.23932 |
HbMPK8/HbMPK9–MeMPK16-2 | 520 | 4 | 5 | 0.11 | 0.73888 |
HbMPK15/HbMPK9–MeMPK16-2 | 520 | 4 | 5 | 0.11 | 0.73888 |
a The Tajima relative rate test was used to examine the equality of the evolutionary rate between rubber tree paralogues; b Mt is the sum of the identical sites in all three sequences tested; c M1 is the number of unique differences in the first paralogue; d M2 is the number of unique differences in the second paralogue; e If p < 0.05, the test rejects the equal substitution rates between the two duplicates and infers that one of the two duplicates has an accelerated evolutionary rate.