Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 19;53(8):991–1004. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0129-4

Table 4.

Summary of the key themes from qualitative responses on contextual influences on intervention delivery

Group support psychotherapy (GSP) Group HIV education (GHE)
Group facilitators Group members Group facilitators Group members
Facilitators of intervention delivery
 Intrapersonal factors  Intrapersonal factors
  Formal and informal training received Keen interest and eagerness to learn   Some prior knowledge on HIV related issues Keen interest and eagerness to learn
Had some prior knowledge of the HIV topics
  Prior mental health knowledge Perceived GFs as supportive and respectful Perceived GFs as supportive and respectful
Adequate time was allocated to question and answer session
 Program factors  Program factors
  Availability of intervention manual Provision of transport allowance    Availability of intervention manual Provision of transport allowance
  Intervention content easy to follow Provision of refreshments during sessions    Intervention content easy to follow Provision of refreshments during sessions
  Provision of financial incentive GFs never missed a group session    Provision of financial incentive GFs never missed a group session
  Open communication channels with trainers Intervention content culturally sensitive    Open communication channels with trainers Intervention content culturally sensitive
 Gender and cultural factors  Gender and cultural factors
  Allowed to elect their own group leader    Allowed to elect their own group leader
  Allowed to have an opening and closing ritual    Allowed to have an opening and closing ritual
  Allowed to give the group a traditional name    Allowed to give the group a traditional name
  Having gender specific sessions    Having gender specific sessions
Barriers of intervention delivery
 Intrapersonal factors  Intrapersonal factors
  Impatience with slow learners and those intoxicated with alcohol Poor time management   Feelings of guilt experienced when not able to teach coping skills yet GMs were emotionally unwell and some were intoxicated with alcohol Some GMs were always intoxicated with alcohol
  Limited knowledge on emotional self-care Some GMs were always intoxicated with alcohol   Limited knowledge of ART medications
 Program factors  Program factors
  Intervention manual was not translated to the local language Absence of writing material for GMs   Intervention manual was not translated to the local language Some GMs were unhappy and disgruntled when they realized that they were not learning the same skills taught in GSP
A few GMs complained of long distances between their homes and meeting venue   Sessions lacked information on Alcohol use problems Absence of writing material for GMs who needed them
  Financial incentive considered inadequate by the male GFs Change of meeting venue without prior notice   Financial incentive considered inadequate by the male GFs GMs not allowed to share their personal experiences
  Lack of a co-facilitator increased work load Time allocated for sharing personal problems not enough for GMs   Sessions not interactive and did not include practical sessions No practical sessions given
  Group size of 10–12 considered large given the multiple problems of PLWH Meeting venue in mental health clinics were unpleasant to GMs   Lack of a co-facilitator increased work load
  Gender and cultural factors   Gender and cultural factors
GMs missed sessions due conflicting work schedules and burial attendances Some husbands refused to grant permission to their wives to attend sessions
Female GMs brought children to group sessions