Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 1;10:541. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2467-z

Table 4.

Geometric (arithmetic) mean counts of Ixodes ricinus and percent efficacy of lotilaner at 12 h following post-treatment challenge infestations (Group 2, control and Group 4, lotilaner)

Day of challenge Untreated control Lotilaner Comparison
Mean (arithmetic) Range Mean (arithmetic) Range Efficacy (%) (arithmetic mean efficacy)
7 Before incubation 14.4 (14.9) 10–23 1.0 (1.9) 0–9 93.2 (87.4) t (7) = 6.47, P = 0.0003
After incubation 14.4 (14.9) 10–23 0.1 (0.1) 0–1 99.4 (99.2) t (7) = 20.98, P < 0.0001
14 Before incubation 13.2 (13.6) 9–17 0.6 (1.5) 0–6 95.3 (89.0) t (7) = 6.55, P = 0.0003
After incubation 13.1 (13.5) 9–17 0.2 (0.3) 0–1 98.6 (98.1) t (7) = 17.21, P < 0.0001
21 Before incubation 12.5 (12.9) 8–18 0.6 (1.3) 0–5 95.5 (90.3) t (7) = 7.99, P < 0.0001
After incubation 12.5 (12.9) 8–18 0.2 (0.3) 0–1 98.5 (98.1) t (7) = 21.49, P < 0.0001
28 Before incubation 13.3 (13.8) 8–20 0.3 (0.6) 0–4 97.5 (95.5) t (7) = 10.49, P < 0.0001
After incubation 12.8 (13.3) 8–20 0.3 (0.4) 0–2 98.0 (97.2) t (7) = 13.28, P < 0.0001
35 Before incubation 9.9 (10.4) 5–17 1.5 (1.9) 0–4 84.6 (81.9) t (7) = 6.03, P = 0.0005
After incubation 9.8 (10.3) 5–16 0.6 (0.8) 0–2 94.2 (92.7) t (7) = 10.59, P < 0.0001