Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 15;14(10):1227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101227

Table 4.

Associations between sociodemographic factors and bad MBD behaviors.

Predictive Factors Model 1 Pig Rearing Model 2 Not Using Bed Net Model 3 Not Using Repellent
AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI AOR 95% CI
Age group: Adult vs Child 1.23 (0.4, 3.76) 1.04 (0.35, 3.07) 0.78 (0.25, 2.44)
Gender: Female vs Male 1.16 (0.91, 1.48) 0.87 (0.68, 1.11) 0.84 (0.66, 1.07)
Ethnicity ref.: Han *** *** ***
 Dai 1.41 (0.88, 2.27) 2.47 (1.53, 3.97) ** 0.45 (0.28, 0.74) **
 Aini 1.14 (0.73, 1.78) 1.32 (0.85, 2.03) 1.32 (0.84, 2.06)
 Yi 1.58 (1.02, 2.42) * 0.55 (0.36, 0.84) ** 1.59 (1.04, 2.43) *
 Yao 1.86 (1.19, 2.9) ** 0.52 (0.34, 0.8) ** 1.25 (0.8, 1.94)
 Other 0.64 (0.4, 1.04) 2.44 (1.52, 3.92) ** 0.9 (0.57, 1.43)
Occupation Reference: Farmer *** *** ***
 Student 0.67 (0.22, 2.07) 1.32 (0.44, 3.93) 0.21 (0.07, 0.68) **
 Other 0.15 (0.08, 0.27) ** 0.39 (0.22, 0.67) ** 0.28 (0.17, 0.48) **
Education level Reference: Less than primary school ***
 Primary school 1.5 (1.01, 2.22) * 0.85 (0.57, 1.26) 1.02 (0.66, 1.55)
 Secondary school or above 1.99 (1.33, 2.96) ** 1.06 (0.71, 1.59) 1.04 (0.68, 1.6)
Annual family income (per capita RMB) ref.: ≤8000 (RMB) ***
 8000–12,000 0.98 (0.71, 1.35) 0.67 (0.48, 0.93) * 0.61 (0.44, 0.85) **
 12,000–15,000 0.9 (0.64, 1.26) 0.77 (0.55, 1.08) 0.66 (0.46, 0.93) *
 >15,000 0.67 (0.43, 1.04) 0.68 (0.44, 1.05) 1.04 (0.67, 1.62)
Family size ref. ≤3 ***
 4–5 1.41 (0.98, 2.04) 1.17 (0.81, 1.68) 1.33 (0.92, 1.92)
 ≥6 2.11 (1.4, 3.18) ** 1.4 (0.93, 2.11) 1.34 (0.88, 2.02)

AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI: confidence interval; * p (Wald’s test) < 0.05; ** p (Wald’s test) < 0.01; *** p (LR-test) < 0.05. Model 1: Associations between sociodemographic factors and environmental pig rearing; Model 2: Associations between sociodemographic factors and bed net use behaviors; Model 3: Associations between sociodemographic factors and repellent use behaviors.