Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 21;14(10):1255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101255

Table 3.

Association between food shopping pattern and food environments with daily dietary intake, North Carolina and Kentucky, 2016.

Unhealthy Shopping Pattern F/V Always in Home Junk Food Always in Home Chips Always in Home Candy Always in Home Soda Always in Home School Healthy Score School Unhealthy Score
dietary intake F/V (cup) 0.06
(−0.08, 0.2)
0.31
(0.22, 0.41) *
−0.15
(−0.24, −0.06) *
−0.12
(−0.21, −0.33) *
−0.17
(−0.27, −0.07) *
−0.1
(−0.18, −0.01) *
−0.001
(−0.003, 0.001)
−0.001
(−0.001, −0.0001) *
Added Sugar (tsp) 2.41
(0.99, 3.82) *
0.84
(−0.15, 1.84)
2.24
(1.36, 3.12) *
3.36
(2.51, 4.2) *
3.52
(2.61, 4.43) *
1.69
(0.85, 2.5) *
0.001
(−0.02, 0.02)
−0.0004
(−0.005, 0.004)
Sugar Sweetened Beverages (tsp) 0.01
(−0.03, 0.06)
−0.02
(−0.05, 0.01)
0.01
(−0.01, 0.04)
0.01
(−0.02, 0.04)
0.01
(−0.02, 0.04)
0.01
(−0.02, 0.03)
−0.001
(−0.001, 0) *
−0.0001
(−0.0002, 0.0001)

* p < 0.05; reference healthy shopping pattern; reference never in the home.