Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;8(16):3356–3361. doi: 10.7150/jca.20784

Table 3.

Univariable and multivariable analyses of predictors of DMFS and OS for propensity score-matched cohort in p-stage I-III patients

Variable Univariable analysis of DMFS Univariable analysis of OS
HR 95%CI p value HR 95%CI p value
Age(≥60 v <60) 1.478 1.016-2.150 0.041** 1.569 1.031-2.387 0.036**
Gender (female v male) 0.867 0.595-1.263 0.458 0.709 0.464-1.086 0.114
T stage 1.329 1.024-1.726 0.033* 1.280 0.952-1.721 0.103
N stage 1.636 1.334-2.008 <0.001** 1.754 1.395-2.205 <0.001**
Location (Peripheral v Central) 0.675 0.391-1.165 0.158 0.589 0.332-1.044 0.070
Pathology
Scc v Ad 0.558 0.314-0.991 0.046** 0.654 0.333-1.283 0.216
Others v Ad 0.660 0.344-1.264 0.210 0.886 0.421-1.863 0.750
Chemotherapy# 0.859 0.590-1.250 0.428 0.584 0.382-0.892 0.013**
CTNB or non-biopsy 1.323 0.909-1.927 0.144 1.388 0.911-2.114 0.127
Radiotherapy# 1.231 0.502-3.022 0.650 1.526 0.619-3.764 0.359

Abbreviations: CTNB, computed tomography-guided needle biopsy; Ad, adenocarcinoma; Scc: squamous-cell carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. *variables were Statistical significance in univariable analysis; **variables were also Statistical significance in multivariable analysis. #: adjuvant therapy.