Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;8(16):3356–3361. doi: 10.7150/jca.20784

Table 4.

Univariable and multivariable analyses of predictors of DMFS and OS for propensity score-matched cohort in p-stage ≤ II patients.

Clinical factors Univariable analysis of DMFS Univariable analysis of OS
HR 95%CI p value HR 95%CI p value
Age (≥60 v <60) 1.057 0.646-1.730 0.824 1.515 0.844-2.718 0.164
Gender (female v male) 0.815 0.497-1.337 0.418 0.630 0.351-1.132 0.122
T stage 1.202 0.770-1.877 0.419 1 0.592-1.690 1.000
N stage 2.387 1.380-4.127 0.002** 2.236 1.198-4.175 0.011**
Location (Peripheral v Central) 0.645 0.259-1.608 0.347 0.640 0.230-1.781 0.640
pathology
Scc v Ad 0.363 0.191-0.690 0.002** 0.386 0.184-0.812 0.012**
Others v Ad 0.326 0.141-0.758 0.009** 0.390 0.150-1.013 0.053
Chemotherapy# 1.445 0.876-2.384 0.250 0.822 0.466-1.452 0.500
CTNB or non-biopsy 1.720 1.041-2.844 0.034** 1.652 0.951-2.948 0.090
Radiotherapy# 3.829 1.194-12.280 0.024* 3.891 1.205-12.568 0.023*

Abbreviations: CTNB, computed tomography-guided needle biopsy; Ad, adenocarcinoma; Scc: squamous-cell carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. *variables were Statistical significance in univariable analysis; **variables were also Statistical significance in multivariable analysis. #: adjuvant therapy.