Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017 Jan 17;8(2):272–280. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00363

Table 1.

Sensitivity to Glucose and DA. Data were collected using a series of triangular waveforms coupled to a GOx EME, and are plotted in Figures 2B and C.

Holding Potential Glucose Sensitivity (nA/mM) Glucose r2 Glucose % Difference vs. +0.1 V DA Sensitivity (nA/μM) DA r2 DA % Difference vs. +0.1 V
+0.1 V 14.8 ± 0.4 0.99 0 2.1 ± 0.2 0.98 0
−0.1 V 12.0 ± 0.3 0.99 −18.8** 5.0 ± 0.4 0.98 138.1*
−0.2 V 9.6 ± 0.5 0.99 −35.1*** 5.8 ± 0.6 0.97 176.2**
−0.3 V 7.3 ± 0.6 0.98 −50.7*** 7.2 ± 0.9 0.96 242.9***
−0.4 V 4.7 ± 0.4 0.98 −68.2*** 10.6 ± 0.5 0.99 404.8***

Bonferroni post hoc comparisons revealed significant differences compared to a +0.1 V holding potential (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, *** p<0.001).