Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 4;58(11):2162–2170. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M079822

TABLE 3.

PTS comparison of patients based on low HDL-C levels and mutation status

Top 10th Percentile of PTS Bottom 10th Percentile of PTS
Control M+ M− OR (95% CI, P) Control M+ M− OR (95% CI, P)
Lipid Genetics Clinic 52/503 4/41 4/95 M+: 0.94 (0.27–2.90, 0.583) 51/503 8/41 24/95 M+: 2.15 (0.86–5.19, 0.063)
M: 0.38 (0.111.13, 0.038) M: 3.00 (1.675.35, <0.0001)
MHI Biobank 119/1,198 3/22 14/179 M+: 1.43 (0.33–5.21, 0.380) 120/1,198 1/22 24/179 M+: 0.43 (0.02–3.03, 0.341)
M−: 0.77 (0.41–1.41, 0.228) M−: 1.39 (0.85–2.27, 0.107)
UPenn 52/503 NA 31/349 M+: NA 51/503 NA 40/349 M+: NA
M−: 0.85 (0.52–1.38, 0.280) M−: 1.15 (0.72–1.82, 0.307)
Overall 171/1,701a 7/63 49/623 M+: 1.12 (0.46–2.60, 0.455) 171/1,701a 9/63 88/623 M+: 1.49 (0.67–3.20, 0.186)
M−: 0.76 (0.54–1.08, 0.063) M: 1.47 (1.11–1.96, <0.01)

Whole numbers represent patient counts, with the numerator indicating the number of individuals with a PTS in the top 10th or bottom 10th percentile and the denominator indicating the total number of individuals in the patient subgroup. ORs were calculated with a confidence level of 95%. Left-tailed and right-tailed tests of significance were considered for the top 10th and bottom 10th percentiles, respectively. NA, not available. Boldface type indicates statistically significant ORs.

a

The 1KG group was counted only once, given that it was used in both the Lipid Genetics Clinic and UPenn cohorts.