Table 1.

Final characterization of CON, CON + TUDCA, HFD and HFD + TUDCA mice.

	CON	CON + TUDCA	HFD	HFD + TUDCA
Body Weight (g)	30.33 ± 1.21	29.68 ± 1.48	41.22 ± 1.18*	33.88 ± 1.27*#
Perigonadal fat pad weight (g)	0.314 ± 0.03	0.276 ± 0.02	1.309 ± 0.10*	0.8746 ± 0.06#
Retroperitoneal fat pad weight (g)	0.154 ± 0.01	0.133 ± 0.01	0.630 ± 0.06*	0.336 ± 0.03*#
Fasted Glycemia (mg/dL)	90 ± 4.32	91.5 ± 10.0	111 ± 5.42*	89.38 ± 5.56
Fed Glycemia (mg/dL)	137 ± 7.78	121 ± 6.02	161 ± 2.00*	138 ± 6.48

(*)Indicates statistic differences compared to CON, and ^(#)Indicates differences between HFD and HFD + TUDCA (One-way ANOVA followed by Newmans-Keuls posttest, P < 0.05). Data are mean ± SEM (n = 4–8).