Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 1;7:14882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14922-8

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Statistical significance of R-G IF with different data sizes (a) A heat map showing the mean Student’s t-test p-value that resulted from the comparison of the calculated R-G IFs of simulated experimental groups with 5 images/group for a range of R-G IFs (values indicate the mean p-value for 20 comparisons). (b) A heat map showing the mean Student’s t-test p-value that resulted from the comparison of the calculated R-G IFs of simulated experimental groups with 10 images/group for a range of IFs (values indicate the mean p-value for 20 comparisons). (c) A heat map showing the mean Student’s t-test p-value that resulted from the comparison of the calculated R-G IFs of simulated experimental groups with 20 images/group for a range of R-G IFs (values indicate the mean p-value for 20 comparisons).