Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 25;4(10):170449. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170449

Table 1.

(a) Results of the model testing, comparing the power of two models—one with only the plant removal treatments, one with both the removal treatment and the amount of biomass removed as factors—in explaining the change in ecosystem CO2 net exchange (NEE), gross ecosystem production (GEP), net methane (CH4) flux, and the content of dissolved organic carbon, before and after plant removal. LLmax = maximized log-likelihood of the model, AIC = Akaike Information criterion, AICc = corrected AIC. (b) Results of analysis on variance (ANOVA) on the most significant model, i.e. the model with the lowest AICc.

(a)
ecosystem process model LLmax AIC AICc
NEE ∼treatment 2.5 9.1 16.06
∼treatment + biomass removed 3.3 9.4 18.95
GEP ∼treatment + biomass removed –5.3 26.6 36.21
∼treatment –9.0 32.0 39.00
CH4-flux ∼treatment 80.3 –146.7 –139.69
∼treatment + biomass removed 80.3 –144.7 –135.10
DOC ∼treatment –84.2 182.4 189.44
∼treatment + biomass removed –83.9 183.8 193.36
(b)
factor F-value p-value
NEE treatment 7.9 ≤0.001
GEP treatment 10.5 ≤0.001
biomass removed 6.1 0.024
CH4-flux treatment 0.6 0.686
DOC treatment 0.8 0.547