Table 1.
Author and Year of Publication | Patient Follow-up Time | Number of Patients | Age, Mean andStandard Deviation | Mean Reduction in Fibroid Volume | NPV Mean (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Park et al., 2014 | 3 months | 79 | 43.6±4.4 | 23.1% | 62.7±25.5 |
Kim et al., 2012 | 3 months | 27 | 44.5±3.8 | 64.2% | 64.2±19.9 |
Ikink et al., 2013 | 6 months | 46 | 45.3±4.1 | 29% | 40±22 |
LeBlang et al., 2010 | 6 months | 80 | 44±3.2 | 31% | 55±25 |
Morita et al., 2008 | 6 months | 48 | 42.6±5.8 | 33% | 60±18 |
Rabinovic et al., 2007 | 6 months | 35 | 46.4±4.7 | 15% | 31±23 |
Hindley et al., 2004 | 6 months | 109 | 44.8±4.9 | 13.5% | 25±6.0 |
Lenard et al., 2008 | 12 months | 66 | 45.4±4.4 | 9.3% | 16.3±13.3 |
Dobrotwir et al., 2012 | 12 months | 74 | 42±7.0 | 38% | 67±25 |
Wang et al., 2012* | 24 months | 78 | 38.2±6.4 | 90.1% | 80±12 |
Funaki et al., 2009 | 24 months | 91 | 40.4±4.6 | 39.5% | 67±25 |
Kim et al., 2011 | 36 months | 40 | 46±4.5 | 32% | 32.1±6.2 |
NPV: nonperfused volume.
Study of women with submucosal fibroids.