Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 1;9(1):e2017063. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2017.063

Table 3.

Relationship between foetal haemoglobin levels, socio-demographic and clinical burden of children with sickle cell anaemia.

Demographic and clinicalburden Low HbF (N = 66) High HbF (N = 39) Pvalue Mean ± SD HbF P value
Age group (years)
 1 – 5 16 (45.7) 19 (54.3) 12.1 ± 6.1
 6 – 10 36 (72.0) 14 (28.0) 0.036*** 8.9 ± 5.5 0.024*
 11 – 15 14 (70.0) 6 (30.0) 8.3 ± 6.2
Gender
 Male 46 (78.0) 13 (22.0) <0.001 8.0 ± 5.6 <0.001**
 Female 20 (43.5) 26 (56.5) 12.2 ± 5.8
Social class
 I 7 (77.8) 2 (22.2) 9.1 ± 6.3
 II 15 (65.2) 8 (34.8) 0.527 10.0 ± 6.2 0.877*
 III 22 (66.7) 11 (33.3) 9.4 ± 5.6
 IV 22 (55.0) 18 (45.0) 10.4 ± 6.4
Frequency of painepisodes
 <3 33 (57.9) 24 (42.1) 0.251 10.7 ± 6.5 0.147**
 ≥3 33 (68.8) 15 (31.2) 8.9 ± 5.3
Frequency of transfusion
 <3 65 (62.5) 39 (37.5) 0.334*** 9.9 ± 6.0 0.808**
 ≥3 1 (100) 0 (0) 8.4
Frequency of hospital admission
 <3 65 (64.4) 36 (35.6) 0.116*** 9.8 ± 6.1 0.347**
 ≥3 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0) 12.7 ± 3.3
SCD severity
 Mild SCD 41 (56.2) 32 (43.8) 10.8 ± 6.0
 Moderate 25 (78.1) 7 (21.9) 0.032 7.7 ± 5.6 0.013**
*

Analysed by ANOVA;

**

independent sample t-test;

***

Fisher’s exact test applied;

The figures in parentheses are percentages of the total across each row.