Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 16;8(45):79165–79174. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16298

Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factor for OS.

Factors No. of patients Median OS (mo.) P Hazard ratio (95%CI) P
Treatment method 0.177
Raltitrexed group 40 7.4
Control group 46 5.8
Sex 0.666
Male 79 6.3
Female 7 8.2
Age (years) 0.960
≤ 60 61 6.3
> 60 25 7.4
ECOG
Performance status
0.567
0 8 9.8
1-2 78 6.3
HBsAg 0.635
Negative 20 6.2
Positive 66 6.8
BCLC stage ﹤0.001 0.140 (0.069, 0.285) ﹤0.001
Stage B (intermediate) 28 12.5
Stage C (advanced) 58 5.7
Tumor number 0.195
Single 9 12.7
Multiple 77 6.6
Child-pugh class 0.216
A 71 6.8
B 15 5.6
AFP, ng/mL 0.019 0.110
≤ 400 36 8.6
> 400 50 5.8
Tumor size, cm 0.023 0.360
≤ 10 63 7.4
> 10 23 5.7
Extrahepatic metastases 0.002 0.648
Absence 60 7.4
Presence 26 5.8
Portal vein tumor thrombus ﹤0.001 0.380
Absence 32 10.9
Presence 54 5.7
Ascites 0.682
Absence 75 6.8
Presence 11 6.3

Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HbsAg, Hepatitis B surface antigen; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; AFP, Alpha-fetoprotein.