Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;8(45):79971–79981. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20402

Table 3. The univariate and multivariate regression analysis to identify prognostic factors for RFS.

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
RFS
Age 0.993 (0.975–1.010) 0.398 - -
Gender 1.592 (0.769–3.295) 0.210 - -
Operative time 1.001 (0.999–1.004) 0.308 - -
Operative procedure 1.104 (0.722–1.686) 0.649 - -
Operative method 1.108 (0.731–1.679) 0.629 - -
Blood loss 1.000 (1.000–1.001) 0.011 - -
Surgical margin 0.955 (0.621–1.469) 0.834 0.548 (0.343–0.875) 0.012
Tumor size 1.616 (1.085–1.243) < 0.001 - -
Number of tumors 1.116 (0.539–2.309) 0.768 - -
Differentiation 1.118 (0.802–1.557) 0.512 - -
MVI classification 5.389 (3.382–8.585) < 0.001 5.907 (3.543–9.848) < 0.001
Envelope invasion 3.032 (1.568–5.863) 0.001 2.868 (1.442–5.704) 0.003
Cirrhosis 1.362 (0.551–3.368) 0.503 - -
Viral hepatitis 1.478 (0.785–2.783) 0.226 - -
AFP level 1.813 (1.369–2.402) < 0.001 - -
Postoperative Treatment strategy 0.004 < 0.001
TACE 0.865 (0.534–1.402) 0.557 0.633 (0.385–1.041) 0.072
RT 0.416 (0.243–0.711) 0.001 0.278 (0.154–0.501) < 0.001