Table 4.
Change in uptake MC surgery after intervention and Cox-regression analysis.
| Variables | Uptake of MC surgery | Cox-regression of uptake of MC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention (%) | After intervention (%) | x 2 | P | RR* | 95% CI | P | |
| Model A | 0 | 23.7 (115/485) | 142.2 | <0.001 | 2.4 | 1.5–3.8 | <0.001 |
| Model B | 0 | 17.1 (90/527) | 108.9 | <0.001 | 2.2 | 1.3–3.6 | 0.002 |
| Model C | 0 | 9.4 (45/481) | 51.1 | <0.001 | 1 | — | — |
| x 2 | — | 35.765 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P | — | 0.000 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 0 | 22.9 (250/1493) | 298.4 | <0.001 | — | — | — |
Note: RR*, the rate of MC acceptability that Model A and Model B compared to Model C, respectively. Cox regression model adjusting for demographic (age, ethnicity, marital status and education) and regions, estimated RR (relative risk) with 95% CI (confidence interval). Defining the baseline time as the starting point, the endpoint was either acceptance of MC surgery or, for uncircumcised participants, the end of the second follow-up session.