Table 4.

Logistic Diagonal Reference Models predicting mobility effects on overweight/obesity (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m²), The Netherlands 2009

	Males			Females
	Coef	95% CI	p	Coef	95% CI	p
Model 1
Diagonal interceptsa
µ 11: low	0.73	[0.55; 0.97]	0.030	0.98	[0.72; 1.34]	0.901
µ 22: medium	0.74	[0.52; 1.03]	0.070	0.55	[0.38; 0.78]	<0.001
µ 33: high	0.41	[0.28; 0.60]	<0.001	0.31	[0.21; 0.47]	<0.001
w: weight of originb	0.35	[−0.12; 0.82]		0.32	[0.01; 0.64]
β: covariatesc
Downwards mobility	1.27	[0.86; 1.88]	0.227	1.03	[0.66; 1.60]	0.900
Age (centred)	1.05	[1.03; 1.06]	<0.001	1.04	[1.02; 1.06]	<0.001
Native	0.68	[0.54; 0.86]	0.001	0.70	[0.55; 0.89]	0.004
Marital status
No partner (ref)
Married cohabitation	2.38	[1.80; 3.15]	<0.001	1.59	[1.19; 2.12]	0.002
Unmarried cohabitation	1.42	[1.01; 2.00]	0.047	1.41	[0.97; 2.05]	0.073
No cohabitation	1.36	[0.90; 2.06]	0.147	0.81	[0.48; 1.34]	0.419
Model 2
Diagonal interceptsa
µ 11: low	0.75	[0.56; 1.00]	0.048	1.01	[0.73; 1.38]	0.962
µ 22: medium	0.73	[0.51; 1.08]	0.093	0.57	[0.40; 0.82]	0.003
µ 33: high	0.43	[0.30; 0.63]	<0.001	0.32	[0.22; 0.48]	<0.001
w: weight of originb	0.11	[−0.56; 0.77]		0.43	[−0.02; 0.89]
β: covariatesc
Upwards mobility	1.05	[0.78; 1.40]	0.792	0.87	[0.58; 1.32]	0.531
Age (centred)	1.05	[1.03; 1.06]	<0.001	1.04	[1.02; 1.06]	<0.001
Native	0.70	[0.56; 0.88]	0.002	0.70	[0.55; 0.89]	0.004
Marital status
No partner (ref)
Married cohabitation	2.37	[1.79; 3.15]	<0.001	1.59	[1.19; 2.13]	0.002
Unmarried cohabitation	1.41	[1.00; 1.99]	0.049	1.41	[0.97; 2.06]	0.071
No cohabitation	1.37	[0.90; 2.07]	0.138	0.82	[0.49; 1.35]	0.436

Using the International Standard Classification of Education 2011, educational level is classified into three categories: (i) low (categories 1–2), (ii) medium (categories 3–4), and (iii) high (categories 6–8)

^aThe diagonal intercepts are odds

^bThe w-parameter is a weight parameter. No valid p value can be computed, as the weight parameter is constrained between zero and one

^cThe coefficients for the covariates are odds ratio’s