Table 6.
BIPQ scales | Netherlands | Japan | t test; p value |
---|---|---|---|
M (SD) | M (SD) | ||
Consequences | |||
TAC | 7.6 (1.7) | –a | – |
AC | 6.9 (2.3) | 5.4 (2.8) | 0.003 |
FEC | 6.4 (2.1) | 6.5 (2.6) | n.s. |
TC | –a | 6.1 (2.9) | – |
n.s.b | n.s.b | ||
Timeline | |||
TAC | 5.5 (3.0) | –a | – |
AC | 5.8 (2.7) | 6.3 (2.2) | n.s. |
FEC | 5.4 (3.4) | 6.7 (2.4) | n.s. |
TC | –a | 5.8 (2.4) | – |
n.s.b | n.s.b | ||
Personal Control | |||
TAC | 5.0 (2.9) | –a | – |
AC | 4.5 (2.7) | 6.3 (2.1) | 0.001 |
FEC | 4.8 (3.1) | 5.7 (2.0) | n.s. |
TC | –a | 5.7 (2.1) | – |
n.s.b | n.s.b | ||
Treatment Control | |||
TAC | 8.8 (1.3) | –a | – |
AC | 8.4 (1.3) | 6.7 (2.1) | <0.001 |
FEC | 9.1 (1.1) | 7.4 (1.8) | <0.001 |
TC | –a | 6.7 (1.6) | – |
n.s.b | n.s.b | ||
Identity | |||
TAC | 4.0 (2.3) | –a | – |
AC | 3.2 (2.1) | 2.7 (2.1) | n.s. |
FEC | 3.8 (2.2) | 3.0 (2.5) | n.s. |
TC | –a | 2.6 (2.2) | – |
n.s.b | n.s.b | ||
Concerns | |||
TAC | 5.6 (2.5) | –a | – |
AC | 6.7 (2.4) | 7.3 (2.4) | n.s. |
FEC | 4.9 (3.1) | 7.2 (2.6) | 0.008 |
TC | –a | 6.5 (2.7) | – |
n.s.b | n.s.b | ||
Coherence | |||
TAC | 7.0 (2.4) | –a | – |
AC | 6.9 (2.4) | 6.5 (2.0) | n.s. |
FEC | 5.7 (2.7) | 6.6 (1.6) | n.s. |
TC | –a | 6.9 (1.7) | – |
n.s.b | n.s.b | ||
Emotional Representations | |||
TAC | 4.9 (2.3) | –a | – |
AC | 5.7 (2.4) | 4.1 (2.7) | 0.003 |
FEC | 4.6 (3.1) | 4.6 (2.6) | n.s. |
TC | –a | 4.7 (2.4) | – |
n.s.b | n.s.b |
aOnly mean scores are displayed if number of observations per group >15
bManova multivariate F-scores for illness perception domains within each country (between group: chemotherapy) are not significant: p = 0.12 the Netherlands and p = 0.33 in Japan