Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 15;3:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2015.07.008

Table 1.

Correlation between KIF14 expression and clinical classification in OSCCs.

Clinical classification Total Results of immunostaining no. of patients (%)
Pvalue
KIF14 negative KIF14 positive
Age at surgery (years)
 <60 18 9 (50) 9 (50) 0.382
 ≧60, <70 24 8 (35) 16 (65)
 ≧70 62 23 (37) 39 (63)
Gender
 Male 65 24 (37) 41 (63) 0.438
 Female 39 16 (41) 23 (59)
T-primary tumor
 T1 6 4 (67) 2 (33) 0.019
 T2 54 25 (46) 29 (54)
 T3 20 6 (30) 14 (70)
 T4 24 5 (22) 19 (78)
N-regional lymph node
 Negative 62 22 (35) 40 (65) 0.121
 Positive 42 18 (44) 24 (56)
Stage
 I 5 3 (60) 2 (40) 0.563
 II 42 17 (37) 25 (63)
 III 19 6 (32) 13 (68)
 IV 38 14 (39) 24 (61)
Vascular invasion
 Negative 85 36 (43) 49 (57) 0.439
 Positive 19 4 (21) 15 (79)
Histopathologic type
 Well 64 24 (38) 40 (62) 0.512
 Moderately 33 13 (40) 20 (60)
 Poorly 7 3 (43) 4 (57)
Tumoral site
 Gingiva 30 15 (50) 15 (50) 0.471
 Tongue 58 20 (35) 38 (65)
 Buccal mucosa 10 4 (40) 6 (60)
 Oral floor 6 1 (17) 5 (83)

P<0.05 was considered significant.