Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Metab. 2017 Sep 14;26(4):672–685.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.08.019

Figure 3. Gut microbiota mediates EODF induced WAT beiging.

Figure 3

(A) Length of small intestine of AL mice, EODF mice, mice transplanted with AL microbiota (AL/MT), and mice transplanted with EODF microbiota (EODF/MT). n=8 mice/group.

(B) UniFrac distances of AL and EODF mice. n=7–8 mice/group.

(C) Z-scores for genera between AL and EODF mice. n=7–8 mice/group.

(D) Hierarchical clustering diagram comparing ceca of AL and EODF mice. n=7–8 mice/group.

(E) Representative Phyla Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) abundance (%) of ceca of AL and EODF mice. n=7–8 mice/group.

(F) Ucp1 mRNA expression in inguinal WAT in the fed state. n= 8 mice/group.

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Different lowercase letters indicate different statistical significance by two-tailed unpaired t-test (E) or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest (A, F), a, p < 0.05; b, p < 0.01; c, p < 0.005; and d, p < 0.001. Black letters versus AL, and green letters versus AL/MT.

See also Figure S6.