Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 2;17:199. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0593-1

Table 2.

Pairwise comparative analyses between each NCT and GAT in subgroups divided by G-IOP

Subgroupsa n C-IOP – G-IOP N-IOP – G-IOP T-IOP – G-IOP
Low-teen 14 1.71 ± 2.23 ( p = 0.013) −1.14 ± 2.57 (p = 0.120) 1.14 ± 1.96 (p = 0.048)
Mid-teen 22 1.77 ± 1.34 ( p < 0.001) −0.32 ± 1.67 (p = 0.382) 1.00 ± 2.07 (p = 0.034)
High-teen 16 0.56 ± 1.59 (p = 0.178) −1.75 ± 1.65 ( p = 0.001) −0.81 ± 1.83 (p = 0.097)

C-IOP IOP value measured by Canon NCT, N-IOP Nidek NCT, T-IOP Topcon NCT, G-IOP GAT

Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. P value by paired t-test

aCategorized into low-teen (<14 mmHg), mid-teen (≥14 and ≤17 mmHg) and high-teen (>17 mmHg) groups