Table 4.
Inoculum pressure assessed using surrounding CBSD values for community phytosanitation managed (PRG, SRG and TRG) and control fields of cassava in Chato and Mkuranga.
| Na | Min no. Surrounding Fieldsb | Max no. Surrounding Fieldsc | Min. Surrounding CBSDd | Max. Surrounding CBSDe | Ave. Surrounding CBSDf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chato | ||||||
| CRG | 9 | 15 | 32 | 214.3 | 1596.6 | 625 |
| PRG | 10 | 3 | 15 | 0.29 | 114.1 | 57.9 |
| SRG | 10 | 7 | 18 | 4.2 | 66.8 | 28.1 |
| TRG | 10 | 14 | 26 | 9.8 | 39.3 | 19.8 |
| Mkuranga | ||||||
| CRG | 6 | 5 | 12 | 95.7 | 319.3 | 141.4 |
| PRG | 10 | 5 | 19 | 5 | 31.8 | 20.5 |
| SRG | 10 | 3 | 17 | 7.7 | 73.7 | 34 |
a
Number of cassava fields surrounding monitored plots (within a radius of 250m).
b
Number of cassava fields surrounding the monitored plot with the fewest surrounding fields.
c
Number of cassava fields surrounding the monitored plot with the most surrounding fields.
d
Minimum surrounding CBSD value for monitored plots in this group.
e
Maximum surrounding CBSD value for monitored plots in this group.
f
Average surrounding CBSD value for monitored plots in this group.