Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 25;207(3):1167–1180. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300305

Table 1. Distribution of the 951 hybrids considered for QTL detection in the 36 populations according to the populations of origin of their parental lines.

Parental line populations F1: F373 × F02803 F2: F373 × F03802 F3: F02803 × F03802 F4: F373 × F7088 F5: F02803 × F7088 F6: F03802 × F7088 Total no. of hybrids Total no. of lines
D1: F1808 × F04401 31 27 22 30 25 27 162 139
D2: F1808 × F98902 34 27 22 30 23 32 168 144
D3: F04401 × F98902 28 29 23 30 26 27 163 140
D4: F1808 × F7082 28 28 25 30 27 27 165 138
D5: F04401 × F7082 33 29 23 28 24 30 167 142
D6: F98902 × F7082 24 23 15 25 21 18 126 99
Total no. of hybrids 178 163 130 173 146 161 951 802a
Total no. of lines 162 139 111 154 118 138 822b 1624

Dent populations are named D1–D6 and flint populations are named F1–F6, followed by the names of the two founder lines. The number of hybrids derived from each parental population is indicated (“Total no. of hybrids”) as well as the number of lines that contributed to hybrids (“Total no. of lines”).

a

Total number of flint lines contributing to hybrids.

b

Total number of dent lines contributing to hybrids.