Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 25;207(3):1167–1180. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300305

Table 4. Cross-validation estimates of the quality of prediction of different models (average R2 and its SD) including population effects or population effects and QTL effects.

Model DMC DMY DtSILK PH
Population effects 28.4 ± 4.18 (SD) 17.1 ± 4.16 (SD) 10.4 ± 2.97 (SD) 29.2 ± 4.35 (SD)
Pop+QTL GCA 48.2 ± 4.48 (SD) 29.0 ± 5.32 (SD) 32.9 ± 4.60 (SD) 49.8 ± 4.82 (SD)
Pop+QTL GCA and SCA 47.4 ± 4.58 (SD) 27.3 ± 5.13 (SD) 32.1 ± 4.81 (SD) 48.3 ± 4.78 (SD)

For the models including QTL, for each sampling, QTL detected in the whole data set had their effects in the training set tested following a backward procedure and only the significant QTL were considered in the prediction model. Predictions were based on GCA effects only or on models considering also SCA effects significant at a 5% individual risk level. Pop, population.