Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 18;8(47):82314–82325. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19319

Table 4. Phylotypes significantly different at the phylum level.

Taxonomy Control (proportions) Macrosomia (proportions) P value
Bacteria_unclassified 53.29% 21.34% 0.003**
Proteobacteria 21.94% 38.63% 0.024*
Firmicutes 4.58% 10.77% 0.039*
Gemmatimonadetes 0.00% 0.61% 0.045*
Bacteroidetes 7.24% 12.85% 0.112
Nitrospirae 0.11% 0.54% 0.196
Deinococcus-Thermus 0.00% 0.04% 0.198
Synergistetes 0.00% 0.28% 0.198
TM6 0.00% 0.24% 0.198
Caldiserica 0.17% 0.00% 0.346
Elusimicrobia 0.18% 0.00% 0.346
Spirochaetae 0.30% 0.00% 0.346
Acidobacteria 1.81% 0.78% 0.359
Hyd24-12 0.00% 0.01% 0.409
Lentisphaerae 0.00% 0.01% 0.409
Microgenomates 0.00% 0.00% 0.409
SHA-109 0.00% 0.12% 0.409
Tenericutes 0.00% 0.02% 0.409
Parcubacteria 0.11% 0.01% 0.477
Cyanobacteria 0.30% 0.77% 0.495
Saccharibacteria 0.15% 0.31% 0.664
Armatimonadetes 0.01% 0.28% 0.746
Chlorobi 0.09% 0.54% 0.839
Verrucomicrobia 0.27% 0.17% 0.858
Actinobacteria 7.33% 8.49% 1.000
Chloroflexi 1.45% 2.60% 1.000
Planctomycetes 0.66% 0.57% 1.000
WCHB1-60 0.00% 0.02% 1.000

Data of macrosomia and control groups were showed as relative abundance (%) of phylum and family in each group. Statistical analysis was performed by the Mann-Whitney U test adjusted for multiple testing. n=10, in each group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001 macrosomia vs. control group.