Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 1;10(4):292–298. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593475

Table 1. Distribution of patients, the volume of graft harvested from the proximal tibial site by lateral approach, and complications.

Gender Age Indication Volume Complication
F 21 Orthognathic sequel 14 No
F 22 Pathology 15 Local pain
F 22 Pathology 15 Superficial infection
F 24 Implantology 12 No
F 24 Fracture sequel 18 No
F 31 Pathology 14 No
F 33 Pathology 17 No
F 34 Fracture sequel 8 No
F 64 Pathology 11 No
F 35 Pathology 9 No
F 38 Implantology 9 No
F 38 Fracture sequel 10 No
F 41 Implantology 20 No
F 43 Fracture sequel 9 No
F 43 Fracture sequel 13 Suture dehiscence
F 48 Pathology 16 No
F 48 Pathology 16 No
F 49 Pathology 12 No
Mean 37 13.5
SD 12 3.4
Min 21 8
Max 64 20
Gender Age Indication Volume Complication
M 19 Fracture sequel 9 No
M 22 Pathology 15 No
M 23 Fracture sequel 8 No
M 23 Fracture sequel 10 No
M 25 Pathology 15 Local pain
M 28 Implantology 13 No
M 33 Nonunion 10 No
M 36 Implantology 9 No
M 40 Implantology 23 No
M 44 Implantology 10 No
M 45 Nonunion 10 Unaesthetic scar
M 56 Pathology 15 No
M 57 Implantology 14 No
Mean 35 12.4
SD 13 4.1
Min 19 8
Max 57 23

Abbreviations: F, female; M, man; m, media; max, maximal; min, minimal; SD, standard deviation.