Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 7;475(12):3026–3043. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5486-3

Table 2.

Overview of wrought alloy samples*

Implant design Sample number Time in situ Head size Taper type Damage score Column damage Alloy type Banded structure
(months) (mm)
HA-1 HA-1-1 122.1 28 12/14 1 N 2 N
HA-1-2 29.8 36 12/14 4 N 2 N
HA-1-3 16.7 32 12/14 4 N 1 Y
HA-1-4 176.8 32 12/14 4 Y 2 Y
HA-2 HA-2-1 31.4 36 12/14 4 Y 1 Y
HA-2-2 53.9 36 12/14 3 N 1 Y
HA-2-3 84 36 12/14 1 N 2 Y
HA-2-4 77 32 12/14 4 Y 2 Y
HA-3 HA-3-1 1.1 32 12/14 4 Y 2 Y
HA-3-2 83.1 32 12/14 4 Y 2 Y
HA-3-3 24.5 32 12/14 4 Y 1 Y
HA-3-4 60.8 40 12/14 1 N 1 Y
HA-3-5 98.9 28 12/14 1 N 1 Y
SA-4 SA-4-1 111.3 12/14 3 N 2 N
SA-4-2 NA 12/14 4 N 2 N

* Alloys came from three head designs and one stem design made by three different manufacturers (HA-1, HA-2, HA-3, and SA-4); there were four components for HA-1 and HA-2, five components for HA-3, and two components for SA-4; the damage score was a modified Goldberg score [12]; alloy type refers to alloys with a hard phase volume fraction of < 1% (Type 1) or 1% to 5% (Type 2); N = no; Y = yes; NA = not available.