Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 30;8:301. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00301

Table 2.

Reproductive parameters of dams treated prepregnancy with OFS, S, both, or neither.

Lean-Control Obese-HFS Obese-Control Obese-OFS Obese-S Obese-OFS + S
Mated rats 13/13 (100%) 12/12 (100%) 13/13 (100%) 12/12 (100%) 13/13 (100%) 12/12 (100%)
Fertility index 13/13 (100%) 10/12 (83.3%) 13/13 (100%) 10/12 (83.3%) 13/13 (100%) 12/12 (100%)
Delivery index 10/13 (76.9%) 10/10 (100%) 11/13 (84.6%) 9/10 (90.0%) 11/13 (84.6%) 9/12 (75.0%)
Pregnancy index 9/13 (69.2%) 8/10 (80.0%) 11/13 (84.6%) 8/10 (80.0%) 10/13 (76.9%) 8/12 (66.7%)
Litter size (# live at birth) 10.3 ± 1.5 7.14 ± 1.3 8.5 ± 1.5 11.1 ± 1.2 8.33 ± 0.8 6.57 ± 1.1
Pup survival (% live at 2 weeks) 82.5 63.7 57.4 64.4 82.7 81.0
Sex prevalence (% males) 38.1 51.6 51.6 40.4 50.4 51.1

Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 11–13 per group).

HFS, high fat/sucrose; OFS, oligofructose; S, sitagliptin.

Obese in the group name indicates diet-induced obese rats that underwent the respective prepregnancy interventions, except Obese-HFS that remained untreated and consumed HFS diet throughout the study. Lean in the group name indicates a lean reference group that never underwent the obesity induction period and consumed control AIN-93 diet throughout the study. No statistically significant differences exist between maternal treatment groups (p ≥ 0.05).