Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;18:466. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1872-9

Table 1.

Comparison of ADMM and CD+LS algorithms

% Success Rate Time (s)
p n ADMM CD+LS ADMM CD+LS
20 50 100.0 100.0 0.03 0.0
(0.0) (0.0) (0.01) (0.0)
100 100 100.0 100.0 0.06 1.3
(0.0) (0.0) (0.00) (0.1)
100 500 100.0 80.0 0.14 0.6
(0.0) (9.2) (0.04) (0.2)
200 1000 100.0 80.0 0.54 3.9
(0.0) (9.2) (0.12) (0.4)

Sample means (standard errors in parentheses) of rates for successful convergence (in percentages), and running times (in seconds), based on 20 simulation replications, for the proposed ADMM and CD+LS algorithms