Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Dec 8;70(1):53–60. doi: 10.1002/acr.23246

Table 2.

Subgroup associations of crepitus with incident tibiofemoral SOA 1 year after crepitus assessment

Incident SOA Unadjusted Odds Ratio for Incident SOA Adjusted Odds Ratio for Incident SOA*
People with ROA but without symptoms at baseline. 2973 observations from 1085 people Total cases = 488
(+ROA, −Sx)
Never 251/1952 (12.9%) Ref Ref
Rarely 63/327 (19.3%) 1.6 (1.2 – 2.2) 1.6 (1.2 – 2.1)
Sometimes 98/428 (22.9%) 2.0 (1.5 – 2.6) 1.9 (1.4 – 2.5)
Often 43/153 (28.1%) 2.6 (1.8 – 3.8) 2.5 (1.7 – 3.6)
Always 33/113 (29.2%) 2.8 (1.8 – 4.2) 2.8 (1.8 – 4.4)
p for trend < 0.0001 p for trend < 0.0001
People without ROA but with symptoms at baseline. 2137 observations from 660 people Total Cases = 67
(−ROA, +Sx)
Never 30/1049 (2.9%) Ref Ref
Rarely 6/239 (2.5%) 0.9 (0.4 – 2.1) 1.0 (0.4 – 2.4)
Sometimes 15/485 (3.1%) 1.1 (0.6 – 2.0) 1.0 (0.5 – 2.1)
Often 7/210 (3.3%) 1.2 (0.5 – 2.7) 1.2 (0.5 – 2.9)
Always 9/154 (5.8%) 2.1 (1.0 – 4.6) 1.8 (0.8 – 4.2)
p for trend = 0.2 p for trend = 0.3
People without ROA and symptoms at baseline. 6127 observations from 1750 people Total Cases = 81
(−ROA, −Sx)
Never 51/4312 (1.2%) Ref Ref
Rarely 10/647 (1.5%) 1.3 (0.7 – 2.6) 1.4 (0.7 – 2.7)
Sometimes 17/788 (2.2%) 1.8 (1.1 – 3.2) 1.8 (1.0 – 3.3)
Often 2/263 (0.8%) 0.6 (0.2 – 2.6) 0.8 (0.2 – 3.2)
Always 1/117 (0.9%) 0.7 (0.1 – 5.3) 0.8 (0.1 – 6.2)
p for trend = 0.3 p for trend = 0.3
*

adjusted for age, sex, and BMI.