Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 31;11:516. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00516

Table 4.

Motivation effects on group-dependent brain activities during reappraisal.

Region of activation Side BA MNI coordinates Cluster size Z score
x y z
A. BASD
Control > MDD
Inferior frontal gyrus L 45 −28 34 −4 2.16
Posterior cingulate R 23 12 −34 18 2.56
Posterior cingulate L 29 −12 −44 18 695 2.39
Lentiform nucleus R 22 −20 2 87 2.28
Parahippocampal gyrus L 36 −28 −34 −10 196 2.1
Middle temporal gyrus L 39 −40 −66 20 105 2.01
Superior temporal gyrus L 39 −48 −54 16 1.82
B. BASR
Control > MDD
Inferior frontal gyrus R 45 46 22 10 55 2.02
Parahippocampal gyrus R 19 42 −46 −8 2.93
Posterior cingulate R 30 28 −70 10 361
Anterior cingulate R 32 14 40 14 72
C. BASF
Control > MDD
Posterior cingulate L 29 0 −36 −20 64 2.25
Superior temporal gyrus L 13 −50 −46 24 1.82
MDD > Control
Lentiform nucleus L −28 −8 −2 93 2.12
Midbrain L −2 −20 −4 52 2.05
Lentiform nucleus R 30 −8 2 42 1.82
D. BIS
Control > MDD
Inferior frontal gyrus L 45 −36 34 218 2.29
Lentiform nucleus R 28 8 4 939 2.32

The group-by-motivation interaction identified regions where BIS/BAS scores modulated brain responses differently between the depressed patients and the control group regardless of reappraisal conditions. All clusters were thresholded at P < 0.05 and AlphaSim-corrected with an extent of at least 54 voxels.