Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Sep 18;220(8):1356–1362. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.09.006

Table 4.

Predictors of peak urinary TCPy among adolescent applicators (n =26)a

Characteristic β 95% CI % differenceb 95% CI Semi-partial R2
  Intercept −1.83 (−6.52; 2.85)
  Hours applying pesticides today 0.91 (0.18; 1.64) 148.41 (19.52; 416.31) 0.30
  Number of days worked in pesticide application in the past week 0.50 (0.17; 0.84) 65.07 (17.99; 130.94) 0.23
  Body surface area (0.5m2) 1.24 (0.06; 2.41) 244.00 (6.67; 1009.41) 0.07
  Mixing pesticides with hand instead of stick 0.53 (−0.36; 1.42) 70.02 (−30.39; 315.30) 0.06
  Wearing clean clothes to work today −0.65 (−1.77; 0.47) −47.92 (−83.04; 59.98) 0.01
  Applying CPF vs. another pesticide −0.71 (−1.86; 0.43) −51.02 (−84.37; 53.52) 0.03
Model R2 0.70
a

Parameters and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated using log-linear regression

b

Refers to predicted percent change in geometric mean TCPy per one unit increase in characteristic