Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 19;6:e50. doi: 10.1017/jns.2017.55

Table 4.

Determinants of faecal energy excretion*

(β Values and 95 % confidence intervals)

Model II (n 182) Model III (n 181)
Square root (energy % (%)) β 95 % CI P β 95 % CI P
Ca intake (Δ1 g/10 MJ per d) 0·24 0·02, 0·46 0·031 0·07 −0·14, 0·28 0·50
Age (Δ10 years) 0·05 −0·04, 0·13 0·26 0·02 −0·06, 0·10 0·68
Sex
 Women Ref. Ref.
 Men −0·06 −0·23, 0·12 0·52 0·02 −0·14, 0·18 0·83
BMI (Δ5 kg/m2) −0·09 −0·18, 0·01 0·08 −0·03 −0·12, 0·06 0·57
Ca supplements
 No Ref. Ref.
 Yes 0·02 −0·18, 0·22 0·84 0·02 −0·17, 0·20 0·84
Dietary fibre (Δ5 g/10 MJ per d) 0·14 0·10, 0·19 <0·001

Energy %, percentage energy excreted; Ref., reference value.

*

All β values and 95 % confidence intervals in the table are raw data, i.e. data have not been back-transformed.

Percentage energy excreted (energy %) (calculated as faecal energy excreted/total energy intake × 100) was square root-transformed and analysed by linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, BMI and supplements containing Ca to investigate the effect of Ca intake (g/10 MJ per d).

Model II + additional adjustment for fibre intake. The interaction fibre × Ca was not significant (P = 0·99) and therefore removed from the model.