Table 4.
Model II† (n 182) | Model III‡ (n 181) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Square root (energy % (%)) | β | 95 % CI | P | β | 95 % CI | P |
Ca intake (Δ1 g/10 MJ per d) | 0·24 | 0·02, 0·46 | 0·031 | 0·07 | −0·14, 0·28 | 0·50 |
Age (Δ10 years) | 0·05 | −0·04, 0·13 | 0·26 | 0·02 | −0·06, 0·10 | 0·68 |
Sex | ||||||
Women | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Men | −0·06 | −0·23, 0·12 | 0·52 | 0·02 | −0·14, 0·18 | 0·83 |
BMI (Δ5 kg/m2) | −0·09 | −0·18, 0·01 | 0·08 | −0·03 | −0·12, 0·06 | 0·57 |
Ca supplements | ||||||
No | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Yes | 0·02 | −0·18, 0·22 | 0·84 | 0·02 | −0·17, 0·20 | 0·84 |
Dietary fibre (Δ5 g/10 MJ per d) | – | – | – | 0·14 | 0·10, 0·19 | <0·001 |
Energy %, percentage energy excreted; Ref., reference value.
All β values and 95 % confidence intervals in the table are raw data, i.e. data have not been back-transformed.
Percentage energy excreted (energy %) (calculated as faecal energy excreted/total energy intake × 100) was square root-transformed and analysed by linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, BMI and supplements containing Ca to investigate the effect of Ca intake (g/10 MJ per d).
Model II + additional adjustment for fibre intake. The interaction fibre × Ca was not significant (P = 0·99) and therefore removed from the model.