Table 4.

Model fit results: goodness-of-fit score comparisons between Unbounded and Bounded models

	ΔBICBounded − Unbounded
	pDDM	cbDDM	usDDM	hpfDDM
Binary choice	1.9* [−0.5, 4.5]6	8.7** [6.3, 11]10	−160 [−365, −19]2	6.6** [6.4, 6.8]10
Confidence	114*** [87, 133]11	115*** [99, 147]11	130*** [92, 150]10	12*** [4.5, 47]9

Values are medians [quartiles]; n = 11. Subscripts indicate the number of subjects that yielded ΔBIC > 2.

^*Positive evidence for unbounded models (ΔBIC > 2).

^**Strong evidence for unbounded models (ΔBIC > 6).

^***(Bold) Very strong evidence for unbounded models (ΔBIC > 10) (Kass and Raftery 1995).