Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 1;8:1934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01934

Table 3.

Distribution of risky drinking among the frequent disclosure and exposure groups.

Risky drinking (8 ≤ AUDIT T1) Risky drinking (8 ≤ AUDIT T2)
(95% CI) (95% CI)
Frequent posting of content reflecting positive aspects of alcohol (T1) 89.1% (87.1–91.1%) 81.8% (78.1–85.4%)
No frequent posting of content reflecting positive aspects of alcohol (T1) 49.8% (48.8–50.9%) 44.0% (42.5–45.5%)
Effect size of difference between the two groups Phi = 0.231*** Phi = 0.222***
Frequent posting of content reflecting negative aspects of alcohol use (T1) 93.1% (89.9–96.3%) 84.7% (78.2–91.3%)
No frequent posting of content reflecting negative aspects of alcohol (T1) 52.5% (51.5–53.5%) 46.6% (45.1–48.2%)
Effect size of difference between the two groups Phi = 0.129*** Phi = 0.123***
Frequent exposure to content reflecting positive aspects of alcohol use (T1) 58.8% (57.6–59.9%) 51.7% (50.1–53.4%)
No frequent exposure to content reflecting positive aspects of alcohol (T1) 34.8% (32.8–36.9%) 32.2% (29.2–35.2%)
Effect size of difference between the two groups Phi = 0.199*** Phi = 0.160***
Frequent exposure to content reflecting negative aspects of alcohol (T1) 63.1% (61.5–64.7%) 55.9% (53.6–58.3%)
No frequent exposure to content reflecting negative aspects of alcohol (T1) 47.4% (46.1–48.7%) 42.2% (40.3–44.0%)
Effect size of difference between the two groups Phi = 0.154*** Phi = 0.135***

AUDIT Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, T1 The time of the first wave, T2 The time of the second wave, CI Confidence interval, Frequent, Monthly or more often,

***

p < 0.001.