Table 3.
Diagnostic characters of advertisement calls from species of the Pristimantis conspicillatus group. Values are given as range (average ± standard deviation).
| Species | Notes/Call | Call length (ms) | Note length (ms) | Pulses | Fundamental frequency (Hz) | Dominant frequency (Hz) | Notes | Calls | N specimens | N populations | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. fenestratus | 2–4 (2.6 ± 0.6) | 157–458 (265.2 ± 81.6) | 50–91 (63 ± 11.4) | 9–17 (12.9 ± 42.2) | 1542–2048 (1746 ± 158) | 1710–3591 (3086.3 ± 580.7) | 55 | 22 | 6 | 4 | Padial and De La Riva (2009) |
| P. koehleri | 3–8 (5.7 ± 1.0) | 173–644 (421 ± 159.8) | 20–54 (35.5 ± 6.6) | 5–9 (7.5 ± 1) | 1732–1971 (1853.5 ± 72.1) | 3245–3971 (3662.4 ± 128.9) | 119 | 21 | 6 | 2 | Padial and De La Riva (2009) |
| P. samaipatae | 1–3 (2 ± 0.2) | 82.2–1062 (291.7 ± 168.1) | 59–141 (89 ± 16.4) | 11–23 (16.4 ± 2.6) | 1535–1834 (1704.9 ± 64.3) | 2922–3853 (3326.7 ± 175.9) | 160 | 98 | 12 | 4 | Padial and De La Riva (2009) |
| P. latro | 7 | 402.36–581.27 (454.83 ± 68.99) | 31–45.918 (39.686 ± 5.12) | 6–9 (7.5 ± 2.12) | 1342–1448,6 (1381.41 ± 35.71 | 2635.89–3272 (3069.21 ± 253.61) | 49 | 7 | 6 | 2 | This study |