Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;117(9):1278–1285. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.290

Table 1. Baseline demographics and GIST characteristics.

Variable Total, N=38
Median age, years 60.0 (32–77)
Male, n (%) 22 (57.9)
Race, n (%)  
 Caucasian 29 (76.3)
 Other 9 (23.7)
ECOG performance status, n (%)  
 0 23 (60.5)
 1 15 (39.5)
Primary site of cancer, n (%)  
 Oesophagus 1 (2.6)
 Stomach 15 (39.5)
 Small intestine 15 (39.5)
 Rectum 2 (5.3)
 Other 5 (13.2)
Tumour histology, n (%)  
 Epithelioid 5 (13.2)
 Spindle 17 (44.7)
 Mixed 11 (28.9)
 Other 5 (13.2)
Mitotic count per 50 HPFs, n (%)  
 ⩽5/50 8 (21.1)
 >5/50 to ⩽10/50 6 (15.8)
 >10/50 10 (26.3)
 Not evaluablea 9 (23.7)
 Missing 5 (13.2)
Metastatic site, n (%)b  
 Pleural effusion (malignant) 1 (2.6)
 Lung 1 (2.6)
 Thoracic lymph nodes 2 (5.3)
 Spleen 1 (2.6)
 Liver 26 (68.4)
 Stomach 1 (2.6)
 Peritoneum 17 (44.7)
 Adrenal 1 (2.6)
 Bladder 2 (5.3)
 Bone, lumbar vertebrae 1 (2.6)
 Other 6 (15.8)
Median number of target lesions (range) 2 (1–5)
Median longest diameter of the largest target lesion, cm (range) 7.0 (1.3–25.0)
Disease progression while on imatinib, n (%) 33 (86.8)
Median time on imatinib, days (range) 132 (19–2065)
Intolerant to imatinib, n (%)c 8 (21.1)
Gene mutation  
KIT mutation  
  Exon 9 5 (13.2)
  Exon 11 14 (36.8)
  Exon 17 1 (2.6)
  Exons 11 and 17 1 (2.6)
PDGFRA mutation  
  Exon 12 1 (2.6)
  Exon 18 1 (2.6)
  Exon D842V 2 (5.3)
Not available 13 (34.2)

Abbreviations: ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HPF=high power fields.

a

Patients for whom the mitotic index was not recorded as fraction of 50 HPFs.

b

One patient may have more than one metastatic site.

c

Three patients reported as both progressed on imatinib and intolerant to imatinib.