Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 6;12(11):e0187463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187463

Table 3. MANOVA post hoc comparisons.

LSD
Dependent Variable (I) (J) Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
t (0–50) SS SD ,0148 ,03409 ,665 -,0521 ,0816
DD DS -,0713 ,03409 ,037 -,1382 -,0045
t(500–550) SS DD -2,3462 ,07566 ,000 -2,4946 -2,1978
DS -2,0865 ,07566 ,000 -2,2349 -1,9381
SD ,3085 ,07566 ,000 ,1601 ,4569
SD DD -,3085 ,07566 ,000 -,4569 -,1601
DS -2,6547 ,07566 ,000 -2,8031 -2,5063
DD -2,3950 ,07566 ,000 -2,5434 -2,2466
T(700–750) SS DD -,2901 ,16206 ,074 -,6079 ,0277

The table shows only the most relevant sections of the MANOVA post-hoc analysis conducted on the performance of the ANN network. SS = means of the store action on the safe stimuli; DD = means of the discard action on the dangerous stimuli; DS = means of the discard action on the safe stimuli; SD = means of the store action on the dangerous stimuli. Significant results are highlighted in bold.