Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 7;28(11):1583–1596. doi: 10.1177/0956797617711968

Table 4.

Effects of Including Covariates in the Model of Children’s Sex as a Predictor of Children’s “What” Spatial Types, as Mediated by Parents’ “What” Spatial Types

Covariate Path a (Children’s sex → parents’ spatial types)
Path b (Parents’ spatial types → children’s spatial types)
Path c (Total effect: children’s sex → children’s spatial types)
Path c′ (Direct effect: children’s sex → children’s spatial types)
Adjusted R2
β t(54) p β t(54) p β t(54) p β t(54) p
Children’s other word types 0.61 2.80 .0072 0.50 5.14 ≤ .001 0.50 2.65 .0107 0.20 1.17 .2500 .6303
Family SES 0.53 2.52 .0149 0.69 5.94 ≤ .001 0.47 2.02 .0485 0.10 0.52 .6100 .5048
Total length of language recording 0.59 2.41 .0196 0.68 6.75 ≤ .001 0.48 1.99 .0500 0.09 0.45 .6500 .5160
Birth order of child 0.61 2.41 .0196 0.70 7.04 ≤ .001 0.51 2.00 .0500 0.08 0.47 .6700 .5065
Parents’ gender 0.61 2.40 .0199 0.71 7.19 ≤ .001 0.56 2.16 .0350 0.20 0.69 .4911 .5089

Note: See Figure 1 for an illustration of the basic mediation model. SES = socioeconomic status.