Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Cell Physiol. 2017 Aug 4;233(2):1585–1600. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26062

Table 1.

Static and dynamic histomorphometry parameters of the proximal tibia from CON and STZ mice fed with LFD or HFD.

	Low Fat Diet		High Fat Diet
	CON (n=5)	STZ (n=5)	CON (n=5)	STZ (n=5)
OS/BS (%)	9.2 ± 3.1	8.3 ± 4.9	6.1 ± 2.7	6.9 ± 4.0
O.Th (µm)	3.49 ± 0.68	3.45 ± 0.35	3.16 ± 0.63	3.44 ± 0.48
Ob.S/BS (%)	13.1 ± 3.3	9.9 ± 4.4	9.3 ± 5.5	9.7 ± 6.3
N.Ob/B.Pm (/mm)	9.8 ± 2.5	7.6 ± 3.1	6.8 ± 3.8	7.2 ± 4.1
N.Ob/T.Ar (/mm²)	57.1 ± 9.1	38.1 ± 10.0	43.6 ± 22.4	44.3 ± 35.1
MAR (µm/day)	0.91 ± 0.19	0.88 ± 0.12	0.91 ± 0.13	0.88 ± 0.16
MS/BS (%)	37.5 ± 9.3	18.7 ± 3.8^*	32.1 ± 3.9	25.4 ± 5.3
BFR/BV (%/day)	1.95 ± 0.53	1.20 ± 0.35	1.58 ± 0.37	1.33 ± 0.30
BFR/BS (µm³/µm²/day)	0.35 ± 0.12	0.17 ± 0.04^*	0.29 ± 0.05	0.22 ± 0.05
ES/BS (%)	2.87 ± 0.60	5.12 ± 1.37^*	3.61 ± 0.87	4.19 ± 1.65
Oc.S/BS (%)	12.3 ± 2.1	20.6 ± 5.1	13.0 ± 2.5	17.7 ± 6.1
N.Oc/B.Pm (/mm)	4.65 ± 0.75	7.61 ± 1.81	6.09 ± 2.67	7.05 ± 2.41
N.Oc/T.Ar (/mm²)	27.9 ± 4.3	37.3 ± 7.0	36.6 ± 11.7	40.2 ± 13.8

^*

p<0.05 compared to CON-LFD.