Table 1.
Reference | Year | Ethnicity | T2DM |
Control |
Matching criteria | Genotype method | Sample size (T2DM/control) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MM | MV | VV | MM | MV | VV | ||||||
Pu et al. (16) | 2012 | Chinese | 160 | 218 | 26 | 250 | 218 | 32 | Age, sex, ethnicity | PCR-HRM | 404/500 |
Li et al. (22) | 2011 | Chinese | 110 | 94 | 28 | 44 | 51 | 7 | Ethnicity | PCR-RFLP | 232/102 |
Shimada et al. (23) | 2009 | Japanese | 395 | 393 | 86 | 412 | 414 | 79 | Ethnicity | TaqMan SNP genotyping assay | 874/905 |
Lin et al. (24) | 2010 | Chinese | 275 | 254 | 45 | 186 | 115 | 22 | Ethnicity | PCR-RFLP | 574/323 |
Noso et al. (15) | 2007 | Japanese | 146 | 166 | 43 | 200 | 158 | 40 | Ethnicity | TaqMan SNP genotyping assay | 355/398 |
Fallah et al. (17) | 2010 | Iranian | 10 | 22 | 18 | 13 | 25 | 12 | Age, sex, ethnicity | PCR-RFLP | 50/50 |
Ji et al. (7) | 2010 | Chinese | 195 | 185 | 46 | 143 | 123 | 15 | Age, sex, ethnicity | PCR-RFLP | 427/281 |
Hu and Song (25) | 2009 | Chinese-Va | 59 | 31 | 6 | 68 | 33 | 3 | BMI, ALT, Cr, UA, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, ethnicity | PCR-RFLP | 96/104 |
Hu and Song (25) | 2009 | Chinese-Lalu | 40 | 11 | 3 | 168 | 60 | 6 | Age, sex, ethnicity, BMI, WHR, SBP, DBP, HDL-C, Hypertension percentage | PCR-RFLP | 54/234 |
Wang et al. (26) | 2015 | Chinese | 45 | 54 | 1 | 249 | 218 | 32 | Age, BMI, DBP, TG, LDL-C, ethnicity | PCR-RFLP | 100/499 |
Zhang et al. (27) | 2017 | Chinese | 25 | 22 | 11 | 105 | 90 | 9 | Sex, BMI, Hypertension percentage, Hyperlipidemia percentage | PCR-RFLP | 58/204 |
T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TC, total cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; PCR-HRM, polymerase chain reaction-high resolution melting curve.
PCR-RFLP and case–control study design were adopted in the above studies.